He’s praised as a protector, condemned as a war criminal, and shielded by powerful allies — yet few truly understand the man behind the headlines. For over three decades, Benjamin Netanyahu has stood at the center of one of the world’s most volatile conflicts, shaping not only the future of Israel but the balance of power in the Middle East. Why does the West continue to back him? What drives his decisions — and what truths remain hidden behind carefully managed narratives? This article dives deep into the untold story of Israel’s longest-serving Prime Minister, exposing the facts the media won’t, and the world refuses to confront.
✩ Table of Contents ✩
- 1. The Rise of Benjamin Netanyahu: From Soldier to Statesman
- 2. The Roots of His Power: Military Legacy, Strategy & Vision
- 3. Why the West Supports Netanyahu – Even in Controversy
- 4. A Nation at War: Netanyahu’s Role in Endless Conflict
- 5. What Does Netanyahu Truly Want? Power, Peace, or Legacy?
- 6. Criticism & Controversy: Global Protests and Media Silence
- 7. The Media Gap: What You're Not Told About Israel’s Longest-Serving PM
- 8. Conclusion: Understanding Netanyahu Beyond Headlines
➤ This external link supports independent journalism
1. The Rise of Benjamin Netanyahu: From Soldier to Statesman
Benjamin Netanyahu’s journey from the battlefields of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to the highest political office in Israel is marked by a carefully constructed image of strength, resilience, and strategic ambition. Born in Tel Aviv in 1949, Netanyahu grew up in a family deeply rooted in Zionist ideology. His father, Benzion Netanyahu, was a historian and a staunch nationalist who strongly influenced Benjamin's worldview, particularly on issues of security, identity, and statehood.
Netanyahu’s early years were shaped by time spent both in Israel and the United States, giving him a bicultural perspective that would later benefit his diplomatic engagements. He studied architecture and political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and also attended Harvard University for further studies. This elite academic background, combined with fluent English and polished oratory skills, gave him a powerful advantage on the global stage — especially in American media and politics.
But before entering politics, Netanyahu first made his name in the military. He served in Sayeret Matkal, Israel's elite special forces unit, participating in high-risk missions in the late 1960s and early 1970s. His military service became a cornerstone of his political identity, often cited as proof of his personal courage and his deep connection to Israel’s security.
Tragedy struck in 1976 when his older brother, Yonatan Netanyahu, was killed while leading the famous Entebbe raid in Uganda — a hostage-rescue mission that has since become legendary in Israeli history. Yonatan’s death became a personal turning point for Benjamin and a central theme in his political narrative, one that he has referenced throughout his career to justify hardline defense policies and nationalistic rhetoric.
Netanyahu entered politics in the 1980s, initially as Israel’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, where he began shaping his international image as a tough, articulate defender of Israel’s actions. His aggressive communication style and unwavering stance on security issues earned him recognition among conservatives in both Israel and the United States.
He officially entered domestic politics as a member of the Likud party and quickly rose through the ranks, becoming Israel’s youngest-ever Prime Minister in 1996. His early term was marked by a focus on security, economic liberalization, and opposition to certain peace initiatives, all of which positioned him as a polarizing but impactful leader.
What makes Netanyahu unique in Israeli politics is not just his longevity, but his ability to rebrand and return — even after electoral defeats and legal challenges. Over the years, he has built a loyal base, often using fear-based messaging around Iran, terrorism, and internal threats to solidify his hold on power. His political playbook relies heavily on media control, dividing opponents, and portraying himself as the only leader capable of defending Israel in a hostile world.
In summary, Netanyahu’s rise was never accidental. It was crafted through a combination of military valor, elite education, emotional symbolism, and strategic alliances. This foundation would later support his controversial policies and his capacity to survive multiple political storms — and it continues to shape how he is perceived, both inside and outside Israel.
2. The Roots of His Power: Military Legacy, Strategy & Vision
To understand Benjamin Netanyahu’s long-standing grip on Israeli politics, one must examine the deep roots of his power, which are not only institutional but also psychological and symbolic. Netanyahu has masterfully positioned himself as the guardian of Israeli security, a reputation built on a foundation of military legacy, strategic maneuvering, and an acute understanding of national fear and identity.
At the heart of this power is his connection to the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and the elite Sayeret Matkal unit. In a country where military service is compulsory, Netanyahu’s combat experience and decorated background offer more than just credibility — they form the emotional core of his public image. He is perceived by many Israelis, especially those on the right, as someone who “understands war firsthand”, making him a trusted figure when national security is under threat.
This military legacy has been amplified through storytelling and media control. Netanyahu frequently references the death of his brother Yonatan in the Entebbe raid as a personal and national sacrifice, reinforcing the idea that his leadership is driven by existential stakes, not mere politics. This narrative gives him a moral authority that other Israeli politicians have struggled to challenge.
Beyond symbolism, Netanyahu has also mastered the strategic chessboard of Israeli politics. His tactics include:
Outflanking rivals by shifting between far-right and center-right positions
Exploiting coalition fractures to maintain power
Timing military operations during election cycles
And using security crises to reshape political debate
This strategic agility has allowed him to survive numerous political crises, including multiple elections in quick succession, indictments for corruption, and growing civil unrest. Despite these challenges, he has consistently returned to power by portraying himself as the only leader capable of navigating the “complex threats” Israel faces — particularly from Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas, and even internal political factions.
Netanyahu’s vision is often framed through the lens of “strength and deterrence” rather than peace. He emphasizes military superiority, intelligence dominance, and technological advantage as essential tools for survival in what he frequently describes as a hostile regional environment. This approach resonates with many Israeli voters who, shaped by decades of conflict, see strength as the only language their enemies understand.
But his power does not come from military ties alone. Netanyahu is a master communicator — fluent in English and Hebrew, skilled at tailoring messages for both domestic and international audiences. On American TV, he appears as a calm, rational defender of democracy. At home, he shifts tone to a more urgent, nationalist posture, warning of internal division and existential threats. This dual identity helps him maintain support both from the West and from his domestic base.
Perhaps most importantly, Netanyahu has forged and maintained strategic alliances with powerful foreign leaders, especially in the United States. From Bill Clinton to Donald Trump, he has navigated shifting American administrations with remarkable skill, ensuring consistent financial, military, and diplomatic backing for Israel under his rule. These international connections further cement his status as a global statesman, even when his domestic approval ratings fluctuate.
In essence, Netanyahu’s power stems from a carefully curated mix of personal sacrifice, elite military service, political survival instincts, and geopolitical networking. His ability to combine these into a consistent and compelling narrative of strength is what has made him not just a leader, but a longstanding symbol of Israeli resilience and aggression — admired by some, feared by others, and criticized by many.
3. Why the West Supports Netanyahu – Even in Controversy
Despite facing intense criticism at home and abroad, Benjamin Netanyahu continues to enjoy strong support from many Western governments, especially the United States and several European allies. This backing persists even when his actions spark international outrage — whether it's military operations in Gaza, expanding settlements in the West Bank, or his approach to peace negotiations. So why does the West continue to support such a divisive figure?
The answer lies in a mix of strategic interests, shared ideology, and long-standing diplomatic relationships that transcend individual controversies.
1. Strategic Ally in the Middle East
Israel is considered the West’s most reliable partner in the Middle East, a region marked by instability, authoritarianism, and growing influence from powers like Iran, Russia, and China. Under Netanyahu, Israel has maintained its status as a military powerhouse with advanced intelligence capabilities, which Western nations frequently rely on. Security cooperation, particularly between the U.S. and Israel, remains one of the strongest in the world, involving cyber defense, surveillance, anti-terrorism operations, and arms development.
This makes Netanyahu — despite his personal controversies — a "strategic asset" in the eyes of many Western leaders, especially those who prioritize defense and counterterrorism.
2. Pro-Western Ideology and Values
Netanyahu has consistently framed himself as a defender of Western values in a region he often portrays as hostile to democracy and freedom. He aligns himself with right-wing Western politicians and presents Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East, a narrative that resonates with conservative governments and think tanks across Europe and North America.
His media-savvy, fluent English, and polished speeches — often delivered directly to Western audiences — reinforce this alignment. Even when his policies violate international norms, Netanyahu positions himself as a misunderstood but necessary leader, navigating Israel through existential threats.
3. Economic and Technological Partnerships
Israel, under Netanyahu’s leadership, has become a global technology hub, especially in fields like cybersecurity, AI, medical innovation, and defense systems. European countries and the U.S. benefit from trade, investment, and joint research agreements with Israeli firms, making their relationship economically important.
In simple terms, economic interests often override moral concerns. Governments may criticize Israel’s military actions in public, but behind the scenes, they continue to sign contracts, share intelligence, and strengthen bilateral ties.
4. Powerful Lobbying Networks
Another key factor in Netanyahu’s sustained Western support is the strength of pro-Israel lobbying, particularly in the United States. Organizations such as AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) exert significant influence on U.S. foreign policy. Through consistent lobbying, media engagement, and campaign financing, these groups ensure that Israeli interests remain bipartisan and protected — regardless of which party holds power.
Netanyahu has long understood and navigated this system effectively, securing unwavering Congressional support even when public opinion shifts.
5. Exploiting the Fear Narrative
Netanyahu is also skilled at using “fear politics” — not just in Israel, but globally. He consistently emphasizes the threat posed by Iran, radical Islamist groups, and regional instability to justify his actions. By presenting himself as the leader best equipped to handle these threats, he wins support from Western leaders who are themselves under pressure to appear tough on terrorism and defense.
Even when his actions result in civilian casualties or UN condemnations, Netanyahu reframes the situation as part of a broader war on extremism — a framing that often earns tacit approval or silence from Western capitals.
In summary, Western support for Netanyahu is not about agreeing with every decision he makes. It’s about shared interests, long-standing strategic cooperation, and a belief that no better alternative exists in the region. As long as Israel remains a tech-savvy, intelligence-rich, military powerhouse, and as long as Netanyahu keeps aligning himself with Western fears and values, this support — however uncomfortable — is likely to continue.
4. A Nation at War: Netanyahu’s Role in Endless Conflict
Few modern leaders are as closely associated with the state of perpetual war as Benjamin Netanyahu. During his long tenure as Prime Minister, Israel has experienced multiple military operations, escalations, and prolonged periods of unrest — particularly in Gaza, the West Bank, and along the northern border with Lebanon. While Netanyahu often presents these conflicts as necessary acts of defense, critics argue that his leadership has helped prolong and normalize warfare, making peace seem increasingly unattainable.
1. The Policy of Deterrence Over Resolution
At the heart of Netanyahu’s approach is the concept of deterrence, not reconciliation. His government consistently pursues policies that focus on military strength, targeted assassinations, iron-wall defense, and technological superiority rather than long-term peacebuilding. In official speeches, he often states that Israel has “no peace partner” and must rely on force to ensure survival.
This philosophy reinforces a militarized mindset within Israeli society — where cycles of conflict are expected and accepted. It also undermines internal and international efforts at meaningful dialogue with Palestinians and regional neighbors.
2. Gaza and Operation After Operation
Since Netanyahu’s return to power in the late 2000s, Israel has launched several military operations in Gaza, including Operation Cast Lead (2008–09), Operation Protective Edge (2014), and the recent, most destructive campaigns in 2023–2024. Each of these operations has resulted in significant Palestinian casualties, infrastructure destruction, and international condemnation — yet very little political change.
Critics argue that Netanyahu’s government uses military action to distract from internal scandals, boost election campaigns, or unify a divided electorate. War, in this sense, becomes a political tool, not just a national necessity.
3. Expanding Settlements and the Erosion of Peace
Under Netanyahu, there has been rapid expansion of Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, which most of the international community considers illegal under international law. These settlements have inflamed tensions, undermined the possibility of a two-state solution, and led to frequent clashes with Palestinians.
The continuation of this policy reflects a deeper strategy: to redraw realities on the ground so that future peace talks become irrelevant. By eroding the geography and practicality of a Palestinian state, Netanyahu ensures that conflict remains the status quo.
4. Division as a Political Weapon
Internally, Netanyahu has also deepened divisions within Israeli society — between left and right, secular and religious, Jewish and Arab citizens. Critics claim that his rhetoric and policies amplify fear and mistrust, allowing him to maintain power by positioning himself as the only leader capable of holding the nation together.
By emphasizing security threats and demonizing critics, Netanyahu effectively sidelines moderate voices, both in Israel and Palestine, who advocate for dialogue. In doing so, he preserves the narrative that war is necessary, peace is naïve, and his leadership is indispensable.
5. The Costs of Endless Conflict
The cost of Netanyahu’s war-centric leadership is measured not just in lives lost, but in generations radicalized, global trust eroded, and hope extinguished. Young Palestinians growing up under blockade, occupation, or military surveillance see little prospect for peace. At the same time, young Israelis are raised in a culture of permanent threat, preparing for military service and expecting recurrent war.
This cycle sustains a regional environment of suspicion, militarism, and trauma — and Netanyahu’s policies, whether by design or consequence, play a central role in keeping that cycle alive.
In conclusion, Netanyahu’s role in Israel’s endless conflict is not just that of a wartime leader — but of a strategist who has made conflict the foundation of political survival. While supporters see him as a protector, critics believe he has helped lock an entire region into an unbreakable pattern of violence, where peace is always delayed, and war is always just around the corner.
5. What Does Netanyahu Truly Want? Power, Peace, or Legacy?
For decades, political analysts, world leaders, and citizens alike have asked a pressing question: What drives Benjamin Netanyahu? Is he a leader striving for a lasting peace, a politician obsessed with maintaining power, or a man consumed with leaving behind a historic legacy? The answer is complex — and layered in contradictions.
1. Power as a Means and an End
Netanyahu’s long political career — now spanning more than three decades — suggests that power itself is central to his identity. No other Israeli leader has served as Prime Minister for as long, and no one has survived as many political storms. He has outmaneuvered internal rivals, dodged criminal charges, and won repeated elections, often in deeply polarized conditions.
Critics argue that Netanyahu prioritizes power above principle, frequently shifting positions to stay in office. Whether forming coalitions with far-right religious parties or appealing to centrist voters, his flexibility seems less about ideology and more about political survival. He has often been accused of manipulating crises, stoking fear, and using conflict as a political tool — all in the service of staying in charge.
Yet this hunger for power is not simply about ego. It’s tied to his belief that he alone is capable of defending Israel in an increasingly hostile world. This narrative — that he is Israel’s only true protector — has been central to every one of his campaigns.
2. Peace — A Goal or a Talking Point?
Throughout his career, Netanyahu has spoken the language of peace — but rarely acted on it. He has participated in peace talks, signed agreements like the Abraham Accords, and maintained relations with some Arab states. However, he has also consistently opposed major peace efforts with the Palestinians, rejected the two-state solution in practice, and expanded settlements in disputed territories.
For many observers, Netanyahu’s version of peace appears to be transactional and selective. His diplomacy tends to focus on strategic normalization — making deals with Arab governments that bypass the core Palestinian issue. This approach gives the appearance of progress while avoiding the difficult compromises true peace would require.
In short, peace may be part of his language — but rarely the priority in his policy.
3. A Carefully Constructed Legacy
Netanyahu is highly conscious of his place in history. He references Winston Churchill, David Ben-Gurion, and other historic leaders in his speeches. He sees himself as a war-time visionary, navigating Israel through existential threats.
His ambition is not just to lead — but to be remembered as the man who secured Israel’s future. Whether through military strength, diplomatic breakthroughs, or transforming Israel into a global tech hub, Netanyahu wants to craft a legacy of security, modernization, and Jewish identity.
But his legacy is deeply polarizing. Supporters see him as a heroic figure who held Israel together, while critics see him as the leader who sacrificed peace, democracy, and unity for personal power.
4. Does He Want All Three?
The reality is that Netanyahu may want all three things simultaneously:
Power to control the present
Peace on his own terms, not through compromise
Legacy that cements his name alongside Israel’s founding fathers
However, these goals often conflict with one another. The pursuit of power can undermine peace. The absence of peace can taint legacy. And a tainted legacy can jeopardize long-term power. Navigating this triangle has defined Netanyahu’s career — and may ultimately define how history remembers him.
In the end, Netanyahu remains an enigma — a man driven by ambition, haunted by history, and trapped between his promises to protect and his refusal to change course. Whether he is remembered as a visionary statesman or a leader who chose survival over peace, depends not only on what he has done — but what he refuses to do.
6. Criticism & Controversy: Global Protests and Media Silence
While Benjamin Netanyahu remains a powerful and often re-elected leader, he is also one of the most criticized political figures of the 21st century. Across the world, from London to Johannesburg, Berlin to Jakarta, people have taken to the streets in protest against his government’s actions — especially regarding the occupation of Palestinian territories, civilian casualties in Gaza, and laws seen as threats to democracy within Israel.
1. Global Protests and Public Backlash
Large-scale protests have erupted during every major escalation in Gaza under Netanyahu’s leadership. In 2023 and 2024, after airstrikes killed hundreds of civilians, massive protests occurred in Paris, New York, Rome, and Istanbul, with demonstrators calling for an immediate ceasefire, and labeling Netanyahu as a "war criminal" — a phrase that has also appeared in some UN debates and international petitions.
The Global South, in particular, has become increasingly vocal in its rejection of Netanyahu’s leadership style. In countries like South Africa, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Brazil, leaders and citizens often criticize what they see as Israeli aggression, apartheid policies, and double standards in international diplomacy. Netanyahu, to many in these regions, is not a symbol of strength — but of occupation, militarism, and impunity.
Yet despite this visible and growing anger, Netanyahu continues to receive support from Western governments, raising questions about how global outrage is filtered, ignored, or dismissed at the diplomatic level.
2. Legal Challenges and Domestic Controversies
Inside Israel, Netanyahu has faced serious corruption charges — including bribery, fraud, and breach of trust — in cases involving media influence, luxury gifts, and favorable regulatory treatment to allies. While he denies all wrongdoing and calls the cases a political witch hunt, the trials have divided Israeli society and sparked protests from both his supporters and opponents.
Moreover, under his leadership, Israel passed a series of controversial laws that critics say weaken judicial independence and threaten democratic checks and balances. In 2023, his government’s push for judicial reform triggered one of the largest protest waves in Israeli history — not from Palestinians, but from Israeli citizens fearing autocratic rule.
This dual image — a global military leader abroad and an embattled figure at home — highlights just how fractured and contested Netanyahu’s public image has become.
3. Selective Silence in Mainstream Media
Despite the intensity of public outrage, much of the Western media tends to soften or omit criticism of Netanyahu, especially during sensitive geopolitical moments. Headlines often focus on Israel’s right to defend itself, without giving equal weight to Palestinian civilian deaths, forced evictions, or the daily realities of life under occupation.
Some analysts suggest that this media imbalance is due to political pressure, fear of being labeled antisemitic, or strong influence from pro-Israel advocacy groups. Others believe it reflects a broader pattern where Western-aligned governments and allies are held to lower accountability standards than adversarial states.
As a result, many critics claim that Netanyahu’s actions are not scrutinized in the same way that the actions of other world leaders would be — especially those from the Global South. This double standard fuels resentment and drives more people toward independent media, social platforms, and international protest movements.
4. Controversy Without Consequence?
What troubles many observers is the lack of real consequences for Netanyahu, despite the scale of the controversies surrounding him. UN resolutions are passed — but not enforced. Protesters march — but are ignored by parliaments. International courts investigate — but are blocked politically. This persistent gap between public outrage and institutional action adds to the perception that Netanyahu is protected by geopolitical privilege.
Whether it’s targeted bombings, settlement expansion, or corruption trials, Netanyahu seems to emerge politically intact. This resilience may be viewed by his supporters as strength — but to his critics, it’s a sign of a global system that fails to hold power accountable.
In summary, Netanyahu remains a deeply polarizing figure — admired by some as a national defender, condemned by others as a global destabilizer. What makes him unique is not just the scale of criticism he faces, but the international silence and inaction that so often follow. This contradiction continues to fuel anger, alienation, and demands for justice across continents.
7. The Media Gap: What You're Not Told About Israel’s Longest-Serving PM
Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the most covered leaders in modern politics — yet also one of the most misunderstood. Despite his lengthy rule, extensive military actions, and repeated controversies, large portions of the global public — especially in the West — remain under-informed or misinformed about many aspects of his leadership. This is not due to a lack of news, but because of a widening media gap between what is reported, what is omitted, and what is deliberately framed.
1. Headlines vs. Context
Mainstream Western media often reports on major flashpoints — rocket attacks, retaliatory bombings, peace summits — but leaves out the underlying conditions that fuel those events. For example, reports of Hamas rocket fire may lead a news cycle, but daily realities such as military checkpoints, home demolitions, settlement expansion, and long-term occupation are often reduced to a footnote, if mentioned at all.
This lack of context contributes to a narrative where Israel is always defending, and never provoking, which in turn shields Netanyahu’s aggressive policies from serious scrutiny.
2. Sanitized Coverage of Military Operations
During Israeli military campaigns in Gaza or the West Bank, many Western outlets echo official Israeli statements, focusing on phrases like “targeting terrorists” or “precision strikes.” Civilian deaths are often referred to as “collateral damage”, and rarely are images of Palestinian casualties or destroyed infrastructure given the same prominence as Israeli damage.
This creates an imbalanced emotional narrative, where viewers are directed to feel sympathy for Israeli security concerns but are insulated from the human cost of Netanyahu's policies on Palestinian civilians.
3. Political Branding in Western Media
Netanyahu has long cultivated a calculated image for international audiences. Fluent in English, charismatic on camera, and often framed as the voice of reason in a hostile region, he has benefited from media training and Western PR consulting firms. His speeches before the U.S. Congress or interviews on CNN, BBC, and Fox News are tailored for Western consumption — highlighting Israel’s democratic values, tech innovations, and victimhood in regional geopolitics.
Meanwhile, the same media outlets rarely feature Palestinian or Arab Israeli voices, or cover dissenting Jewish opinions that oppose Netanyahu’s agenda. This silencing of alternative perspectives helps maintain a simplified “good vs. evil” narrative, where Netanyahu is seen as a bulwark of Western ideals.
4. Underreporting of Corruption and Authoritarianism
While Netanyahu has faced serious criminal investigations, including ongoing corruption trials, these stories often get minimal attention in global outlets compared to his geopolitical moves. For instance, when he attempts to curb judicial independence, centralize power, or pass laws that favor political allies, such moves are often labeled as “controversial” instead of "anti-democratic" — a label that would likely be applied to leaders in non-Western states.
This soft language and low coverage volume effectively shield his domestic power grabs from global outrage.
5. The Consequences of the Gap
The media gap doesn't just affect how Netanyahu is perceived — it shapes public opinion, foreign policy, and even aid allocation. When Western populations don’t see the full picture, they’re less likely to pressure their governments to change course. Meanwhile, Netanyahu continues to operate within a protected narrative bubble, where his policies go unchallenged by the international public.
This selective coverage contributes to a broader sense of global injustice, especially in the Global South, where many see Western media as biased, inconsistent, and complicit in enabling prolonged occupation and war.
In essence, Netanyahu’s image in the Western world is a product not only of political skill — but of a strategically engineered media environment. While independent journalists and activists work to reveal hidden truths, mainstream narratives often remain filtered, sanitized, or distorted. This gap isn’t just a failure of journalism — it’s a failure of accountability, with consequences that ripple far beyond headlines.
8. Conclusion: Understanding Netanyahu Beyond Headlines
Benjamin Netanyahu is not simply a Prime Minister — he is a political era unto himself, a figure whose leadership has shaped not just Israel’s domestic path, but also global perceptions of war, diplomacy, and power. To understand him only through mainstream headlines is to miss the deeper layers of his rule — the military origins, the calculated alliances, the selective peace gestures, and the divisive politics that define his legacy.
He presents himself as a defender of a threatened nation, a strategist navigating a dangerous region. And to his supporters — especially in Israel and the West — this image resonates. But beneath that image lies a far more complex truth: Netanyahu’s leadership has also been a key driver in prolonging conflict, amplifying division, and undermining the prospects for peace in a region that desperately needs stability.
Over the course of this article, we’ve examined how:
His military background and family legacy shaped a personal philosophy rooted in defense and deterrence.
Understanding Netanyahu requires moving past simple labels — “hero,” “villain,” “savior,” “oppressor” — and confronting the real-world impacts of his leadership. His legacy is being written not in slogans, but in ruins, borders, alliances, surveillance systems, and refugee camps. Whether history ultimately sees him as a protector or a destabilizer will depend not just on what he’s done — but on what the world chooses to see, acknowledge, and remember.His rise was built not only on national strength, but also on media control and global alliances.
His strategies have kept him in power for decades, but often at the cost of democracy, dialogue, and regional trust.
His actions have triggered mass protests, especially across the Global South, while receiving muted responses from many Western governments.
Mainstream media often reinforces his narrative by omitting context, softening language, or ignoring uncomfortable facts.
Netanyahu’s story is not just about one leader. It is about the power structures that allow leaders like him to endure, even when they face widespread criticism. It is about the global systems of media, diplomacy, and economics that choose strategic value over moral consistency. And it is about the millions of people — Israeli, Palestinian, and global citizens — whose lives are shaped by those choices.
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment